On 11/26/18 7:03 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/23/18 6:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 11/23/18 8:06 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> It's patch proposal that suggests to use an enum instead of 'int endp' for
>>> functions that expand memory move builtins. I've touch the code multiple
>>
On 11/23/18 6:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/23/18 8:06 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> It's patch proposal that suggests to use an enum instead of 'int endp' for
>> functions that expand memory move builtins. I've touch the code multiple
>> times
>> and it always take me time to realize
On 11/23/18 8:06 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
It's patch proposal that suggests to use an enum instead of 'int endp' for
functions that expand memory move builtins. I've touch the code multiple times
and it always take me time to realize what the magic numbers 0, 1, 2 mean.
Does the suggestion m
Hi.
It's patch proposal that suggests to use an enum instead of 'int endp' for
functions that expand memory move builtins. I've touch the code multiple times
and it always take me time to realize what the magic numbers 0, 1, 2 mean.
Does the suggestion make sense? Do you like enum values? Can it
