Re: [PATCH][IRA] Fix PR87871: [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

2019-04-18 Thread Peter Bergner
On 4/18/19 4:39 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 4/18/19 11:24 AM, Peter Bergner wrote: >> I have confirmed we now assign pseudo p116 to r0 in the ARM test case >> as well as a similar assignment issue on POWER. >> >> This passed bootstrap and regtesting with no regressions on >> powerpc64le-linux

Re: [PATCH][IRA] Fix PR87871: [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

2019-04-18 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 4/18/19 11:24 AM, Peter Bergner wrote: PR87871 exposes a couple of problems. One problem fixed here is that IRA incorrectly adds a conflict in some cases where we have a simple register copy between a pseudo reg and a hard reg. This stopped us from assigning the pseudo reg to that hard reg

[PATCH][IRA] Fix PR87871: [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

2019-04-18 Thread Peter Bergner
PR87871 exposes a couple of problems. One problem fixed here is that IRA incorrectly adds a conflict in some cases where we have a simple register copy between a pseudo reg and a hard reg. This stopped us from assigning the pseudo reg to that hard reg which we wanted to do in the testsuite test c