> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:01:48PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > Why do you think fatal_error is the right thing here? Why doesn't normal
> > error
> > work? Generally, if one function contains 10 #pragma simd loops that
> > require
> > vectorization and 5 out of them aren't vectorized, it i
Hello Jakub,
Please see my responses below.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:59 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplu
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:59:02AM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> --- tree-vect-loop.c (revision 194483)
> +++ tree-vect-loop.c (working copy)
> @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@
> if (flag_enable_cilk && pragma_simd_assert_requested_p
> (loop->pragma_simd_index))
>
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for the Cilk Plus branch mainly affecting both C and C++
compilers. Some of the pragma simd structure's indices were getting lost and
this patch will restore them. It will also insert the appropriate error
messages when assert (in pragma simd) is requested i
