OK.
Jason
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> On September 15, 2015 4:25:37 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill
> wrote:
> >On 08/27/2015 09:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >> With the passes.c hunk in the patch below we FAIL assembly comparison
> >> of g++.dg/pch/system-[12].C because with PCH we ha
On September 15, 2015 4:25:37 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Merrill
wrote:
>On 08/27/2015 09:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> With the passes.c hunk in the patch below we FAIL assembly comparison
>> of g++.dg/pch/system-[12].C because with PCH we have computed
>> DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME and thus appended DW_
On 08/27/2015 09:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
With the passes.c hunk in the patch below we FAIL assembly comparison
of g++.dg/pch/system-[12].C because with PCH we have computed
DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME and thus appended DW_AT_linkage_name early during
PCH generation while without PCH we compute it l
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> With the passes.c hunk in the patch below we FAIL assembly comparison
> of g++.dg/pch/system-[12].C because with PCH we have computed
> DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME and thus appended DW_AT_linkage_name early during
> PCH generation while without PCH we comput
With the passes.c hunk in the patch below we FAIL assembly comparison
of g++.dg/pch/system-[12].C because with PCH we have computed
DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME and thus appended DW_AT_linkage_name early during
PCH generation while without PCH we compute it lazily and end up
appending DW_AT_specification e
