On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 11:14 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> [Ignoring the other issues for now ...]
>
> On 12/04/11 11:02, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Also, your change to use a double-letter sequence beginning with 'j'
> > means any hand-written inline assembly code using a single 'j' will
> > bre
[Ignoring the other issues for now ...]
On 12/04/11 11:02, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Also, your change to use a double-letter sequence beginning with 'j'
means any hand-written inline assembly code using a single 'j' will
break (that's a backwards compatibility issue for users); is there
really no
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:00 +, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Here is a patch I'd like reviewed for mainline GCC post 4.6. I don't
> think it's suitable for stage 3.
>
> At present, the support for constant loading via immediate operands (as
> opposed to constant pools) is not well tuned for Thumb2
Ping.
On 08/12/10 13:00, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Here is a patch I'd like reviewed for mainline GCC post 4.6. I don't
think it's suitable for stage 3.
At present, the support for constant loading via immediate operands (as
opposed to constant pools) is not well tuned for Thumb2. There are a few
se
