On 23/03/16 11:09, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 23/03/16 10:33, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>> On 16/03/16 15:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeing the fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-as
On 23/03/16 10:33, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/03/16 15:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeing the fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/ar
On 16/03/16 15:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeing the fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_5.c scan-assembler-times ld
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing the fails:
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
> r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_5.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
> r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00162.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 02/03/16 13:32, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeing the fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_5.c scan-a
Hi all,
I'm seeing the fails:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_2.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_5.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\tr[0-9]+,
r[0-9]+, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_8.c scan-assembler-times ldrd\