Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb

2018-03-21 Thread Sudakshina Das
Hi On 21/03/18 17:03, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 21/03/18 16:33, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 21 March 2018 at 13:11, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The test pr82989.c which was added in one of previous commits is failing for mthumb and big-endian configurations. The aim of this test was to check that

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb

2018-03-21 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 21/03/18 16:33, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 21 March 2018 at 13:11, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The test pr82989.c which was added in one of previous commits is failing for mthumb and big-endian configurations. The aim of this test was to check that NEON instructions are not being used for simp

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb

2018-03-21 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 21 March 2018 at 13:11, Sudakshina Das wrote: > Hi > > The test pr82989.c which was added in one of previous commits is failing > for mthumb and big-endian configurations. The aim of this test was to > check that NEON instructions are not being used for simple shift > operations. The scanning o

[PATCH][ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb

2018-03-21 Thread Sudakshina Das
Hi The test pr82989.c which was added in one of previous commits is failing for mthumb and big-endian configurations. The aim of this test was to check that NEON instructions are not being used for simple shift operations. The scanning of lsl and lsr instructions and checking its counts were just