On 22 July 2014 12:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that we use UNSPEC_CLS for the clrsb optab when we could be using
> the RTL code for it. I don't see any reason not to use the RTL code and some
> execution tests confirm that the cls instruction implements the expected
> clrsb s
Hi all,
I noticed that we use UNSPEC_CLS for the clrsb optab when we could be using the
RTL code for it. I don't see any reason not to use the RTL code and some
execution tests confirm that the cls instruction implements the expected clrsb
semantics. This patch removes the UNSPEC_CLS definitio