On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> This patch changes the mangling for __float128. I came to the conclusion that
> the current code is so tangled, that it would be better to use U10__float128
> rather than "e". However, if it is felt that we should go with "e", I can go
>
This patch changes the mangling for __float128. I came to the conclusion that
the current code is so tangled, that it would be better to use U10__float128
rather than "e". However, if it is felt that we should go with "e", I can go
that way as well.
I have built the compiler with this patch and
