And yes, the reply was to the other patch in play (vector extract).
I think it is time to go home for the night, and I will commit the fix for PR
71677 tomorrow. :-)
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email: meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 06:06:04PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:58:37PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Assuming there are no regressions in power7, are these patches ok to
> > install in
> > the trunk, and backport to GCC 6.2 after a burn-in period?
>
> Yes, t
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:58:37PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Assuming there are no regressions in power7, are these patches ok to install
> in
> the trunk, and backport to GCC 6.2 after a burn-in period?
Yes, this is fine, thanks for the changes. Okay for 6 too.
> * config/rs6000/c
Sigh, I forgot to attach the patch, and I also used the wrong bug number in my
previous patch.
As we discussed in the patch review, there were some issues with using %Y for
the ISA 3.0 instructions LXSD and STXSD.
I have rewritten the patch so that we have a new memory constraint (%wY) that
expli
