On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 11:20 -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 19:19 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Andrew Pinski writes:
> > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Pinski
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
> > >> w
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 19:19 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Pinski writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Pinski
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >>> Andrew Pinski writes:
> Right now we only produce in
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Pinski writes:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Pinski
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Andrew Pinski writes:
Right now we only produce ins when a zero_extract is used on the
right hand side. We can do better b
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Pinski
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Andrew Pinski writes:
>>> Right now we only produce ins when a zero_extract is used on the
>>> right hand side. We can do better by adding some patterns which
>>> combine for
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Andrew Pinski writes:
>> Right now we only produce ins when a zero_extract is used on the
>> right hand side. We can do better by adding some patterns which
>> combine for the ins instruction. This patch adds those patterns and a
>>
Andrew Pinski writes:
> Right now we only produce ins when a zero_extract is used on the
> right hand side. We can do better by adding some patterns which
> combine for the ins instruction. This patch adds those patterns and a
> testcase which shows a simple example where the code is improved.
Hi,
Right now we only produce ins when a zero_extract is used on the
right hand side. We can do better by adding some patterns which
combine for the ins instruction. This patch adds those patterns and a
testcase which shows a simple example where the code is improved.
OK? Bootstrapped and tes
