On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
> On 08/08/16 18:48, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> On ThunderX, load (and store) pair that does a pair of two word
>>> (32bits) load/stores is slower in some cases than d
On 08/08/16 18:48, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On ThunderX, load (and store) pair that does a pair of two word
>> (32bits) load/stores is slower in some cases than doing two
>> load/stores. For some internal benchmarks, it provides a 2-
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
> On ThunderX, load (and store) pair that does a pair of two word
> (32bits) load/stores is slower in some cases than doing two
> load/stores. For some internal benchmarks, it provides a 2-5%
> improvement.
>
> This patch disables the
On 08/05/2016 12:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
This patch disables the forming of the load/store pairs for SImode if
we are tuning for ThunderX. I used the tuning flags route so it can
be overridden if needed later on or if someone else wants to use the
same method for their core.
+ if (mode ==
Hi,
On ThunderX, load (and store) pair that does a pair of two word
(32bits) load/stores is slower in some cases than doing two
load/stores. For some internal benchmarks, it provides a 2-5%
improvement.
This patch disables the forming of the load/store pairs for SImode if
we are tuning for Thun
