On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/17/15 08:31, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>>
>> On 9 February 2015 at 05:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>>
>>> The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
>>> the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode.
On 02/17/15 08:31, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 9 February 2015 at 05:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode. I
added a new testcase that tests the non-value sibcall pattern too
On 9 February 2015 at 05:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
> the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode. I
> added a new testcase that tests the non-value sibcall pattern too.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aa
The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode. I
added a new testcase that tests the non-value sibcall pattern too.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
