Hi Carl,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:48:33AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> The patch adds UNSPEC_VPERMXOR to the list of instruction to not apply
> swap optimization to. A new test case was added to verify the results
> with -O2 match the expected results from -O0.
> Backport: UNSPEC_VPERMXOR fix from
Hi Carl,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 03:16:38PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> Please let me know if the patch looks OK for the GCC 7 branch.
Okay for 7 (and 6 too, if it applies there). Thanks!
Segher
> 2018-03-21 Carl Love
>
> * config/rs6000/r6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Add case UNSPEC_
On 3/22/18 10:48 AM, Carl Love wrote:
> Backport: UNSPEC_VPERMXOR fix from mainline commit 258530:
> 2018-03-21 Carl Love
>
> * config/rs6000/r6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Add case UNSPEC_VPERMXOR.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-03-21 Carl Love
> * gcc.target/powerpc/cry
GCC Maintainers:
This is a re-post of the patch which addresses the comments to the
commit log by Peter Bergner.
The following patch is a back port from mainlin of a fix for
define_insn crypto_vpermxor_ in gcc/config/rs6000/crypto.md. The
issue is the vpermxor instruction does not work correctly
On 3/21/18 5:16 PM, Carl Love wrote:
> The following patch is a back port from mainlin of a fix for
[snip]
>
> 2018-03-21 Carl Love
>
> * config/rs6000/r6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Add case UNSPEC_VPERMXOR.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-03-21 Carl Love
> * gcc.target/
GCC Maintainers:
The following patch is a back port from mainlin of a fix for
define_insn crypto_vpermxor_ in gcc/config/rs6000/crypto.md. The
issue is the vpermxor instruction does not work correctly when the swap
optimization is applied.
The issue was found as part of commit 258530 to mainli
