Re: [PATCH,rs6000] Fix operand order to subf for p10 fusion.

2021-06-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 11:05:00PM -0500, Aaron Sawdey wrote: > This certainly causes a bootstrap miscompare, and might also be > responsible for PR/100820. The operands to subf were reversed > in the logical-add/sub fusion patterns, and I screwed up my > bootstrap test which is how it ended u

[PATCH,rs6000] Fix operand order to subf for p10 fusion.

2021-06-02 Thread Aaron Sawdey via Gcc-patches
This certainly causes a bootstrap miscompare, and might also be responsible for PR/100820. The operands to subf were reversed in the logical-add/sub fusion patterns, and I screwed up my bootstrap test which is how it ended up getting committed. If bootstrap and regtest passes, ok for trunk (and ev