RE: [PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3

2013-05-15 Thread Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
: Re: [PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3 On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote: > The patch enables FSGSBASE instruction generation for AMD bdver3 > architectures. > > "make -k check" passes. > > Is it OK for upstream? OK. Please also chec

Re: [PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3

2013-05-14 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote: > I think you mean the amdfam10 ISA mismatch between march=native and > march=amdfam10. > The below patch fills the gap. Yes, but please also review other AMD processor entries that possibly miss these two flags. Uros.

RE: [PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3

2013-05-14 Thread Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
cc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3 On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote: > The patch enables FSGSBASE instruction generation for AMD bdver3 > architectures. > > "make -k check" passes. > > Is it OK f

Re: [PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3

2013-05-13 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote: > The patch enables FSGSBASE instruction generation for AMD bdver3 > architectures. > > "make -k check" passes. > > Is it OK for upstream? OK. Please also check for missing PTA_PRFCHW and PTA_FXSR for AMD processors in processor_

[PATCH,i386] FSGSBASE for AMD bdver3

2013-05-13 Thread Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Hi The patch enables FSGSBASE instruction generation for AMD bdver3 architectures. "make -k check" passes. Is it OK for upstream? Regards Ganesh Index: gcc/ChangeLog === --- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 198821) +++ gcc/ChangeLog