Hi Thomas,
thanks for the comments.
> It feels a bit strange to have a check for an allocatable
> behind -fcheck=pointer, but I'm not sure that introducing
> a special check option would really be worth it.
Yes, I thought about that. There's already a discrepancy between
the GFC_RTCHECK_* in li
Hi Harald,
Feedback, such as comments for improvement, are welcome.
It feels a bit strange to have a check for an allocatable
behind -fcheck=pointer, but I'm not sure that introducing
a special check option would really be worth it.
Regarding pointers: They are usually not nullified (unless
th
Dear all,
here is a first version to check the status of ALLOCATABLE and POINTER
arguments to the SIZE intrinsic at runtime.
What it does not yet cover is situations like
complex, allocatable :: z(:)
print *, size (z% re)
Feedback, such as comments for improvement, are welcome.
As is, the
