Hi,
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 08:10:51AM +0200, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:56:05PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> IPA-CP can wreck havoc to transactional memory support as d
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:56:05PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> IPA-CP can wreck havoc to transactional memory support as described in
>> the summary of the PR in bugzilla. It seems the cause is that IPA-CP
>>
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:56:05PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IPA-CP can wreck havoc to transactional memory support as described in
> the summary of the PR in bugzilla. It seems the cause is that IPA-CP
> clones of nodes created by trans-mem do not have their tm_clone flag
> set.
Hi,
IPA-CP can wreck havoc to transactional memory support as described in
the summary of the PR in bugzilla. It seems the cause is that IPA-CP
clones of nodes created by trans-mem do not have their tm_clone flag
set. For release branches we have decided to simply disable IPA-CP of
trans-mem clo
