Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Fix PR92464 by adjust test case loop bound

2019-11-13 Thread Kewen.Lin
Hi Segher, on 2019/11/13 下午6:42, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:31:11PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> As PR92464 shows, the recent vectorization cost adjustment on load >> insns is responsible for this regression. It leads the profitable >> min iteration count to cha

Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Fix PR92464 by adjust test case loop bound

2019-11-13 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:31:11PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > As PR92464 shows, the recent vectorization cost adjustment on load > insns is responsible for this regression. It leads the profitable > min iteration count to change from 19 to 12. The case happens to > hit the threshold. By actu

[PATCH, testsuite] Fix PR92464 by adjust test case loop bound

2019-11-12 Thread Kewen.Lin
Hi, As PR92464 shows, the recent vectorization cost adjustment on load insns is responsible for this regression. It leads the profitable min iteration count to change from 19 to 12. The case happens to hit the threshold. By actual runtime performance evaluation, the vectorized version perform o