Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c

2011-09-09 Thread Richard Earnshaw
Ok. R. On 25 Aug 2011, at 12:45, "Terry Guo" wrote: > Hello, > > I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the patch > intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok to commit to > trunk? > > BR, > Terry > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2011-08-25 T

RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c

2011-09-08 Thread Terry Guo
Hello, Is it ok to commit? BR, Terry > -Original Message- > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry@arm.com] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 9:40 AM > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > Subject: RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for > case

RE: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c

2011-08-30 Thread Terry Guo
Ping. BR, Terry > -Original Message- > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:46 PM > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > Subject: [PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for > case pr42894.c > > Hello

[PATCH, testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c

2011-08-25 Thread Terry Guo
Hello, I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the patch intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok to commit to trunk? BR, Terry gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2011-08-25 Terry Guo * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip ar