On 07/04/16 17:13, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2016 12:09:25 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 06/04/16 12:03, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
Testcase in gcc.target/arm/pr70496.c uses an .arm directive so assumes the
target has an ARM execution state. This patch adds a dg-
On Wednesday 06 April 2016 12:09:25 Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 06/04/16 12:03, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Testcase in gcc.target/arm/pr70496.c uses an .arm directive so assumes the
> > target has an ARM execution state. This patch adds a dg-skip-if directive
> > to sk
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Thomas Preudhomme
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testcase in gcc.target/arm/pr70496.c uses an .arm directive so assumes the
> target has an ARM execution state. This patch adds a dg-skip-if directive to
> skip that test on Cortex-M targets since they don't have such an execution
Hi Thomas,
On 06/04/16 12:03, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
Testcase in gcc.target/arm/pr70496.c uses an .arm directive so assumes the
target has an ARM execution state. This patch adds a dg-skip-if directive to
skip that test on Cortex-M targets since they don't have such an execution
state.
C
Hi,
Testcase in gcc.target/arm/pr70496.c uses an .arm directive so assumes the
target has an ARM execution state. This patch adds a dg-skip-if directive to
skip that test on Cortex-M targets since they don't have such an execution
state.
ChangeLog entry is as follows:
*** gcc/testsuite/Chang