Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Partial fix for PR65546 (GCC 6)

2016-01-28 Thread Bill Schmidt
Actually, please hold off on this. The test in general is just faulty. I'll get something more complete later on. Sorry for the noise, Bill On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 11:45 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65546 discusses the failure > of gcc.dg/vect/

[PATCH, rs6000] Partial fix for PR65546 (GCC 6)

2016-01-28 Thread Bill Schmidt
Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65546 discusses the failure of gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c. The test fails differently on GCC 4.9 and 5 than it does on GCC 6. For GCC 6, the test case is faulty, as we only expect to see the "vectorization not profitable" state