Hi!
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:28:44AM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> >>> 4. Remove descriptions of built-in function that do not belong in this
> >>> section because the
> >>>built-in functions are generic (not specific to PowerPC):
> >>> __builtin_fabsq,
> >>>__builtin_copysignq, __builti
Hi Kelvin,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:12:52AM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> * doc/extend.texi: Tidy documentation of PowerPC built-in functions.
You should note the sections you renamed:
(PowerPC Built-in Functions): Rename to ...
(Low-Level PowerPC Built-in Functions): ... th
Thank you for the prompt review and careful feedback. I didn't notice
your message until this morning. At this point, I'll wait a few days before
committing these changes as I understand we are still in the "RC phase of GCC
8".
On 4/24/18 4:45 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, A
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:25:58PM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> > 4. Remove descriptions of built-in function that do not belong in this
> > section because the
> > built-in functions are generic (not specific to PowerPC):
> > __builtin_fabsq,
> > __builtin_copysignq, __builtin_infq, __
I'm updating this patch to make two improvements to what was submitted
earlier today:
1. Correct the description of the htm-no-suspend CPU feature.
2. Add a comment to clarify that the builtin_divde and builtin_divdeu
built-in functions require 64-bit targets.
Everything else is the same as s
This is the first of several patches to address shortcomings in existing
documentation of
PowerPC built-in functions. The focus of this particular patch is to
improve documentation
of low-level built-in functions that do not require special include headers.
A summary of this patch follows:
1. Ch
