Hi Bill,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:28:33AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> There is a gap in swap optimization that does not properly handle code
> generated by __builtin_vsx_xxspltd. This is expanded into an
> UNSPEC_VSX_XXSPLTD, which is currently treated as ok to swap. It should
> instead be t
Hi,
There is a gap in swap optimization that does not properly handle code
generated by __builtin_vsx_xxspltd. This is expanded into an
UNSPEC_VSX_XXSPLTD, which is currently treated as ok to swap. It should
instead be treated as ok to swap, with special handling to modify the lane
used as the
