Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix REG_CLASS_CONTENTS

2011-06-04 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Pat Haugen wrote: > I should have asked before, ok for 4.6 also after bootstrap/regtest? Yes. Thanks, David

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix REG_CLASS_CONTENTS

2011-06-03 Thread Pat Haugen
On 05/31/2011 02:18 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pat Haugen wrote: > The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were > inadvertently included in NON_FLOAT_REGS. > > Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk? >

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix REG_CLASS_CONTENTS

2011-05-31 Thread David Edelsohn
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pat Haugen wrote: > The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were > inadvertently included in NON_FLOAT_REGS. > > Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk? > > -Pat > > > 2011-05-31  Pat Haugen > >        * con

[PATCH, rs6000] Fix REG_CLASS_CONTENTS

2011-05-31 Thread Pat Haugen
The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were inadvertently included in NON_FLOAT_REGS. Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk? -Pat 2011-05-31 Pat Haugen * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS): Remove vr0..vr2 from