Hi!
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:55:20PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> A new test case introduced for PR81303 failed on powerpc64 (BE, LE). This
> turns out to be due to a missing standard pattern (vcondv2div2df). This
> and a couple of other patterns are easy to support with existing logic
> by ju
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Bill Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A new test case introduced for PR81303 failed on powerpc64 (BE, LE). This
>>> turns out to be due to a
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A new test case introduced for PR81303 failed on powerpc64 (BE, LE). This
>> turns out to be due to a missing standard pattern (vcondv2div2df). This
>> and a coupl
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new test case introduced for PR81303 failed on powerpc64 (BE, LE). This
> turns out to be due to a missing standard pattern (vcondv2div2df). This
> and a couple of other patterns are easy to support with existing logic
> by just a
Hi,
A new test case introduced for PR81303 failed on powerpc64 (BE, LE). This
turns out to be due to a missing standard pattern (vcondv2div2df). This
and a couple of other patterns are easy to support with existing logic
by just adding new patterns with appropriate modes. That's all this patch