On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 07:39:38AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> I can't approve this, but for what it's worth it looks fine to me.
But I can :-) Thanks for looking Bill!
The patch is okay for trunk. Thanks Ke Wen!
Segher
> >2019-12-11 Kewen Lin
> >
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (adjus
Hi!
I can't approve this, but for what it's worth it looks fine to me.
Bill
On 12/11/19 6:31 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi,
We found that the vectorization cost modeling on scalar COND_EXPR is a bit off
on rs6000. One typical case is 548.exchange2_r, -Ofast -mcpu=power9 -mrecip
-fvect-cost-model=u
Hi,
We found that the vectorization cost modeling on scalar COND_EXPR is a bit off
on rs6000. One typical case is 548.exchange2_r, -Ofast -mcpu=power9 -mrecip
-fvect-cost-model=unlimited is better than -Ofast -mcpu=power9 -mrecip (the
default is -fvect-cost-model=dynamic) by 1.94%. Scalar COND_E
