On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 11:37 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > gcc/
> > PR target/61415
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (BU_MISC_1): Delete.
> > (BU_MISC_2): Rename to ...
> > (BU_LDBL128_2): ... this.
> >
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 11:37 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Is this also ok for the FSF 4.9 and FSF 4.8 branches? Without the gcc/
> > changes, we hit an ICE whenever we call __builtin_pack_longdouble and
> > __builtin_unpack_longdouble when
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> PR61415 shows a problem for two test cases that should only be tested if the
> target supports a 128-bit long double. In addition, the 128-bit long double
> pack and unpack builtins should not be enabled unless the target supports
> 128-bit l
PR61415 shows a problem for two test cases that should only be tested if the
target supports a 128-bit long double. In addition, the 128-bit long double
pack and unpack builtins should not be enabled unless the target supports
128-bit long double. The following patch accomplishes that, as well as
