Hi Chung-Lin,
> My only issue is should "serial" really be promoted to such a visible
> construct
> in the middle-end? It's just a special case of parallel, and user debug errors
> can be dealt with specifically. I don't see much value of it being preserved
> past the front-ends into gimplify/omp-
Hi Maciej,
I don't think there's anything wrong with the patch itself; if the testcases
pass, then it should implement the functionality correctly.
My only issue is should "serial" really be promoted to such a visible construct
in the middle-end? It's just a special case of parallel, and user deb
The `serial' construct is equivalent to a `parallel' construct with
clauses `num_gangs(1) num_workers(1) vector_length(1)' implied.
Naturally these clauses are therefore not supported with the `serial'
construct. All the remaining clauses accepted with `parallel' are also
accepted with `seria
