Hi!
On 2022-12-16T15:51:35+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On 9/21/22 09:45, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way
>> of implementing
>> barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant performance
>> drop on some SPEC
On 9/21/22 09:45, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Hi Tom,
I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way
of implementing
barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant performance
drop on some SPEChpc2021
benchmarks:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-Septem
Ping x6
On 2022/12/6 12:21 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping x5
>
> On 2022/11/22 12:24 上午, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Ping x4
>>
>> On 2022/11/8 12:34 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> Ping x3.
>>>
>>> On 2022/10/31 10:18 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Ping x2.
On 2022/10/17 10:29 PM, Chung-L
Ping x5
On 2022/11/22 12:24 上午, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping x4
>
> On 2022/11/8 12:34 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Ping x3.
>>
>> On 2022/10/31 10:18 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> Ping x2.
>>>
>>> On 2022/10/17 10:29 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Ping.
On 2022/9/21 3:45 PM, Chung-Lin
Ping x4
On 2022/11/8 12:34 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping x3.
>
> On 2022/10/31 10:18 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Ping x2.
>>
>> On 2022/10/17 10:29 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> Ping.
>>>
>>> On 2022/9/21 3:45 PM, Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Tom,
I had a patch submitted
Ping x3.
On 2022/10/31 10:18 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping x2.
>
> On 2022/10/17 10:29 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> On 2022/9/21 3:45 PM, Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way of
>>> implementin
Ping x2.
On 2022/10/17 10:29 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 2022/9/21 3:45 PM, Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>> I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way of
>> implementing
>> barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant perfo
Ping.
On 2022/9/21 3:45 PM, Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way of
> implementing
> barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant performance drop on
> some SPEChpc2021
> benchmarks:
> https://gcc.gnu
On 2022/9/21 5:01 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 03:45:36PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Tom,
I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way of
implementing
barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant performance drop
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 03:45:36PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way of
> implementing
> barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant performance drop on
> some SPEChpc2021
> benchmarks:
> ht
Hi Tom,
I had a patch submitted earlier, where I reported that the current way of
implementing
barriers in libgomp on nvptx created a quite significant performance drop on
some SPEChpc2021
benchmarks:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600818.html
That previous patch wasn'
11 matches
Mail list logo
