H.J. Lu; gcc-patches; 'Ian
> Lance Taylor'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH, libgcc] Disable JCR section when java is not enabled
>
> Jakub> Given the state of gcj that it is now only rarely used and most
> Jakub> people just use OpenJDK instead, wouldn't it be a good ide
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 16:48
> To: Joey Ye
> Cc: p...@bothner.com; a...@redhat.com; Tom Tromey; H.J. Lu; gcc-patches;
> 'Ian Lance Taylor'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH, libgcc] Disab
Jakub> Given the state of gcj that it is now only rarely used and most
Jakub> people just use OpenJDK instead, wouldn't it be a good idea to
Jakub> just require that gcj code is linked using gcj driver or, if
Jakub> linked in any other driver, just using a special non-default
Jakub> option (-flink-
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:22:52PM +0800, Joey Ye wrote:
> Dear Java maintainers, are you OK with this patch?
Given the state of gcj that it is now only rarely used and most people
just use OpenJDK instead, wouldn't it be a good idea to just require
that gcj code is linked using gcj driver or, if
Re: [PATCH, libgcc] Disable JCR section when java is not enabled
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Joey Ye wrote:
> > Updated to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01097.html
> >
> > Build passes on arm-none-eabi and bootstrap passes on x86.
> >
>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Joey Ye wrote:
> Updated to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01097.html
>
> Build passes on arm-none-eabi and bootstrap passes on x86.
>
> OK to trunk?
>
> ChangeLog
> * libgcc/Makefile.in: Include JAVA_IS_ENABLED in CFLAGS.
> * libgcc/confi
Updated to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01097.html
Build passes on arm-none-eabi and bootstrap passes on x86.
OK to trunk?
ChangeLog
* libgcc/Makefile.in: Include JAVA_IS_ENABLED in CFLAGS.
* libgcc/configure.ac (java_is_enabled): New variable.
* libgcc/configur
