Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE

2011-10-27 Thread Revital Eres
Hello, >> Tested and bootstrap on all languages except java (PR50879) on >> ppc64-redhat-linux, enabling SMS on loops with SC 1. >> >> OK for mainline? >> > > OK, seems reasonable. > > Please fix typo (in original comment): > -            scheduling passes doesn't touch it.  */ > +            sche

Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE

2011-10-27 Thread Ayal Zaks
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Revital Eres wrote: > Hello, > > The attach patch fixes the current marking of SMS loops to prevent > further scheduling as follows: it marks *all* the loop's bbs with > BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE which prevents them from been scheduled later. > (with the current implemen

[PATCH, SMS] Fix marking of SMSed loops as BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE

2011-10-27 Thread Revital Eres
Hello, The attach patch fixes the current marking of SMS loops to prevent further scheduling as follows: it marks *all* the loop's bbs with BB_DISABLE_SCHEDULE which prevents them from been scheduled later. (with the current implementation if the loop has non empty latch then it will be considered