On 4 November 2016 at 15:36, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since this was committed, I'm seeing a failure in
>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " \\* " 9
>> on aarch64 targets.
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Best op
On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Since this was committed, I'm seeing a failure in
> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " \\* " 9
> on aarch64 targets.
Hi Christophe,
Best open a bug report or I will likely lose this in the crush. If you
On 24 October 2016 at 12:55, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been meaning for some time now to do a better job handling strength
>> reduction candidates where the stride of the candidate and its basis
>> involves a cast (usually wi
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been meaning for some time now to do a better job handling strength
> reduction candidates where the stride of the candidate and its basis
> involves a cast (usually widening) from another type. The two PRs
> https://gcc.gnu.org
Hi,
I've been meaning for some time now to do a better job handling strength
reduction candidates where the stride of the candidate and its basis
involves a cast (usually widening) from another type. The two PRs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
