2014-06-05 15:58 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener :
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> On 04 Jun 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> > On 06/03/14 03:29, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovi
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 04 Jun 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> > On 06/03/14 03:29, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> 2014-06-02 21:27 GMT
On 04 Jun 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 06/03/14 03:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 2014-06-02 21:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
>
> On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovic
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/03/14 03:29, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2014-06-02 21:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hmm, so if I understand thi
2014-06-04 10:46 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 06/03/14 03:29, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2014-06-02 21:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hmm, so if I understand things correct
On 06/03/14 03:29, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-06-02 21:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hmm, so if I understand things correctly, src_fun has no loop
structures attached, thus there's nothing to copy. Presum
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-06-02 21:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
>> On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hmm, so if I understand things correctly, src_fun has no loop
structures attached, thus there's nothing to copy. Presumably at
some later poi
2014-06-02 21:27 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm, so if I understand things correctly, src_fun has no loop
>>> structures attached, thus there's nothing to copy. Presumably at
>>> some later point we build loop structures for the copy from scratch?
>>
>>
On 06/02/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hmm, so if I understand things correctly, src_fun has no loop
structures attached, thus there's nothing to copy. Presumably at
some later point we build loop structures for the copy from scratch?
I suppose it is just a simple bug with absent NULL pointer
2014-06-02 15:56 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener :
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> On 30 May 10:59, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 05/29/14 05:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>> >Hi,
>>> >
>>> >This patch allows to perform function versioning when some structures are
>>> >not available yet.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 30 May 10:59, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 05/29/14 05:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This patch allows to perform function versioning when some structures are
>> >not available yet. It is required to make clones for Pointer Bounds
On 30 May 10:59, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/29/14 05:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch allows to perform function versioning when some structures are
> >not available yet. It is required to make clones for Pointer Bounds Checker
> >right after SSA build.
> >
> >Bootstrapped and test
On 05/29/14 05:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch allows to perform function versioning when some structures are not
available yet. It is required to make clones for Pointer Bounds Checker right
after SSA build.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-05-29
Hi,
This patch allows to perform function versioning when some structures are not
available yet. It is required to make clones for Pointer Bounds Checker right
after SSA build.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-05-29 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-inline.c
14 matches
Mail list logo
