Re: [PATCH, PR70187] Safely use nodes[0] in possible_polymorphic_call_targets

2016-03-20 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > > this patch fixes lto PR70187, a 6 regression. > > We run into an ICE in in possible_polymorphic_call_targets when > accessing nodes[0]->decl because nodes == vNULL: > ... > if (!outer_type->all_derivations_known) > { > if (!speculative && final_warning_records > &&

Re: [PATCH, PR70187] Safely use nodes[0] in possible_polymorphic_call_targets

2016-03-16 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > this patch fixes lto PR70187, a 6 regression. > > We run into an ICE in in possible_polymorphic_call_targets when accessing > nodes[0]->decl because nodes == vNULL: > ... > if (!outer_type->all_derivations_known) > { > if (

[PATCH, PR70187] Safely use nodes[0] in possible_polymorphic_call_targets

2016-03-16 Thread Tom de Vries
Hi, this patch fixes lto PR70187, a 6 regression. We run into an ICE in in possible_polymorphic_call_targets when accessing nodes[0]->decl because nodes == vNULL: ... if (!outer_type->all_derivations_known) { if (!speculative && final_warning_records && TREE_CODE (TREE_TY