Re: [PATCH, PR60467, Cilk+] Fix for ICE with incorrect Cilk_spawn usage

2014-04-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:20:42PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote: > Resending with correct Changelog. > > Is it OK? > > Thanks, > Igor > > gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: > > 2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin > > PR middle-end/60467 > * cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove FUNCTION_DECL >

RE: [PATCH, PR60467, Cilk+] Fix for ICE with incorrect Cilk_spawn usage

2014-04-10 Thread Zamyatin, Igor
-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Zamyatin, Igor > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:55 PM > To: GCC Patches (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org) > Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jakub Jelinek (ja...@redhat.com) > Subject: [PATCH, PR60467, Cilk+] Fix for ICE w

[PATCH, PR60467, Cilk+] Fix for ICE with incorrect Cilk_spawn usage

2014-04-10 Thread Zamyatin, Igor
Hi! This patch filters out another incorrect usage of Cilk_spawn keyword. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64. Ok for trunk? Thanks, Igor gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin PR middle-end/60467 * c-family/cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove FUNCTION_DECL as possible

Re: [PATCH, PR60467, Cilk+] Fix for ICE with incorrect Cilk_spawn usage

2014-04-10 Thread Rainer Orth
"Zamyatin, Igor" writes: > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin > > PR middle-end/60467 > * c-family/cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove FUNCTION_DECL > as possible argument for Cilk_spawn. Both c-family (and cp in your other patch) have their own ChangeLog files.