On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Sorry, I sent you 'bad' patch, resend it.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2014-06-04 19:19 GMT+04:00 Yuri Rumyantsev :
>> I converted test-case to Unix format and new patch is attached.
>>
>> 2014-06-04 19:14 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>>> On Wed,
Sorry, I sent you 'bad' patch, resend it.
2014-06-04 19:19 GMT+04:00 Yuri Rumyantsev :
> I converted test-case to Unix format and new patch is attached.
>
> 2014-06-04 19:14 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:11:26PM +0400, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
>>> Here is update patch with
I converted test-case to Unix format and new patch is attached.
2014-06-04 19:14 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:11:26PM +0400, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
>> Here is update patch with test-case and new ChangeLog.
>
> If approved, please avoid the DOS style line endings in the te
Yuri Rumyantsev writes:
> Property changes on: testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr61391.c
> ___
> Added: svn:executable
Don't make the file executable.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:11:26PM +0400, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Here is update patch with test-case and new ChangeLog.
If approved, please avoid the DOS style line endings in the testcase.
Jakub
Richard.
Here is update patch with test-case and new ChangeLog.
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-06-04 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/61319
* tree-if-conv.c (is_cond_scalar_reduction): Add missed check that
stmt belongs to loop.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.dg/torture/pr61319.c: New test.
2014-06
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here is a simple fix for 61391 - missed a check that statement basic
>> block is inside loop. With this fix test-case from bug is compiled
>> successfully.
>>
>> Bootstr
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a simple fix for 61391 - missed a check that statement basic
> block is inside loop. With this fix test-case from bug is compiled
> successfully.
>
> Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
>
> Is
Hi All,
Here is a simple fix for 61391 - missed a check that statement basic
block is inside loop. With this fix test-case from bug is compiled
successfully.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
Is it OK for trunk?
ChangeLog:
2014-06-04 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-op