On 2019/10/19 9:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 18 October 2019 17:08:54 CEST, Chung-Lin Tang
wrote:
Also, I've added a new libgomp.oacc-fortran/deviceptr-2.f90 testcase
that
actually copies out and verifies the deviceptr computation.
In testcases please do not 'call abort' which
On 19 October 2019 15:04:39 CEST, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>On 18 October 2019 17:08:54 CEST, Chung-Lin Tang
> wrote:
>
>>Also, I've added a new libgomp.oacc-fortran/deviceptr-2.f90 testcase
>>that
>>actually copies out and verifies the deviceptr computation.
>
>In testcases please do not
On 18 October 2019 17:08:54 CEST, Chung-Lin Tang
wrote:
>Also, I've added a new libgomp.oacc-fortran/deviceptr-2.f90 testcase
>that
>actually copies out and verifies the deviceptr computation.
In testcases please do not 'call abort' which is nonstandard but use 'stop N'
which is standard, idea
Hi Thomas,
this is the updated Fortran deviceptr patche, originated from Cesar, and one of
the tests was from James Norris:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00286.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg00532.html
There were a few style cleanups, but the goal of modificati
