On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:48 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:32 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > I'd like to ask for permission to backport the following two LIBITM bug
> > fixes to the FSF 4.8 branch. Although these are not technically fixing
> > regressions, they do fix the
On 03/03/2014 04:48 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> Should I add myself as maintainer for libitm?
Yes.
> Does this come with any other responsibilities than reviewing patches?
No.
r~
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:32 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> I'd like to ask for permission to backport the following two LIBITM bug
> fixes to the FSF 4.8 branch. Although these are not technically fixing
> regressions, they do fix the libitm.c/reentrant.c testsuite failure on
> s390 and powerpc (or
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> I'd like to ask for permission to backport the following two LIBITM bug
> fixes to the FSF 4.8 branch. Although these are not technically fixing
> regressions, they do fix the libitm.c/reentrant.c testsuite failure on
> s390 and powerpc (or a
I'd like to ask for permission to backport the following two LIBITM bug
fixes to the FSF 4.8 branch. Although these are not technically fixing
regressions, they do fix the libitm.c/reentrant.c testsuite failure on
s390 and powerpc (or at least it will when we finally get our power8
code backported
