Totally fine with me. Thanks.
2015-03-10 0:20 GMT-07:00 Tobias Burnus :
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response. Patch built and regtested on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
>
> Actually, I also was about to send a reworked patch myself - see attachment
Hi Alessandro,
Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
Thanks for the quick response. Patch built and regtested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Actually, I also was about to send a reworked patch myself - see
attachment. Additional changes compared to your last patch:
* Add the assembler statement to lib
Thanks for the quick response.
Patch built and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Currently the stub for sync memory in single.c invokes "asm volatile
("" : : : "memory")" but _gfortran_caf_sync_memory is not called when
the code is compiled with -fcoarray=single.
Please let me know if I hav
Dear Alessandro,
Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
so far a "sync memory" statement is translated into a local
"__sync_synchronize ()".
The attached draft patch delegates the action for sync memory (when
-fcoarray=lib is used) to the external function
_gfortran_caf_sync_memory() implemented in the Op
Dear all,
so far a "sync memory" statement is translated into a local
"__sync_synchronize ()".
The attached draft patch delegates the action for sync memory (when
-fcoarray=lib is used) to the external function
_gfortran_caf_sync_memory() implemented in the OpenCoarrays library.
Any suggestions?
