Re: [Patch] Fortran: Fix associated intrinsic with assumed rank [PR101334] [was: [PATCH, Fortran] Fixes for F2018 C838 (PR fortran/101334)]

On 23.09.21 21:13, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 20.09.21 09:58, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 20.09.21 06:01, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This patch fixes some bugs in handling of assumed-rank arguments revealed by the TS29113 testsuite, ... giving a bogus error when passing one as the first argument to the

[Patch] Fortran: Fix associated intrinsic with assumed rank [PR101334] [was: [PATCH, Fortran] Fixes for F2018 C838 (PR fortran/101334)]

On 20.09.21 09:58, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 20.09.21 06:01, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This patch fixes some bugs in handling of assumed-rank arguments revealed by the TS29113 testsuite, ... giving a bogus error when passing one as the first argument to the ASSOCIATED intrinsic. ... ... if I tr

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Fixes for F2018 C838 (PR fortran/101334)

Hi Sandra, This patch fixes some bugs in handling of assumed-rank arguments revealed by the TS29113 testsuite, allowing xfails to be removed from those testcases.  It was previously failing to diagnose an error when passing an assumed-rank argument to a procedure via a non-assumed-rank dummy,

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Fixes for F2018 C838 (PR fortran/101334)

On 20.09.21 06:01, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This patch fixes some bugs in handling of assumed-rank arguments revealed by the TS29113 testsuite, allowing xfails to be removed from those testcases. It was previously failing to diagnose an error when passing an assumed-rank argument to a procedure v

[PATCH, Fortran] Fixes for F2018 C838 (PR fortran/101334)

This patch fixes some bugs in handling of assumed-rank arguments revealed by the TS29113 testsuite, allowing xfails to be removed from those testcases. It was previously failing to diagnose an error when passing an assumed-rank argument to a procedure via a non-assumed-rank dummy, and giving a