Re: [PATCH, ARM] Reintroduce minipool ranges for zero-extension insn patterns

2013-06-20 Thread Julian Brown
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:10:37 +0100 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 18/06/13 16:42, Julian Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following patch removed pool_range/neg_pool_range attributes > > from several instructions as a cleanup, which I believe to have been > > incorrect: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/m

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Reintroduce minipool ranges for zero-extension insn patterns

2013-06-19 Thread Eric Botcazou
> The following patch removed pool_range/neg_pool_range attributes from > several instructions as a cleanup, which I believe to have been > incorrect: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01036.html > > On a Mentor-local branch, this caused problems with instructions like: > > (insn

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Reintroduce minipool ranges for zero-extension insn patterns

2013-06-18 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 18/06/13 16:42, Julian Brown wrote: Hi, The following patch removed pool_range/neg_pool_range attributes from several instructions as a cleanup, which I believe to have been incorrect: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01036.html On a Mentor-local branch, this caused problems wit

[PATCH, ARM] Reintroduce minipool ranges for zero-extension insn patterns

2013-06-18 Thread Julian Brown
Hi, The following patch removed pool_range/neg_pool_range attributes from several instructions as a cleanup, which I believe to have been incorrect: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01036.html On a Mentor-local branch, this caused problems with instructions like: (insn 77 53 87 (set