Hi Jakub, Julian!
Can you please help me understand the following:
On 2018-06-19T10:01:20-0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch implements the OpenACC 2.5 data clause semantics in libgomp.
(This got committed as r261813, 2018-06-20. The code has seen some
changes in the mean time, but th
Hi!
On 2018-06-19T10:01:20-0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch implements the OpenACC 2.5 data clause semantics in libgomp.
> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> @@ -853,6 +853,8 @@ struct splay_tree_key_s {
>uintptr_t tgt_offset;
>/* Reference count. */
>uin
Hi!
On 2018-06-19T10:01:20-0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> --- a/libgomp/target.c
> +++ b/libgomp/target.c
> +attribute_hidden bool
> +gomp_remove_var (struct gomp_device_descr *devicep, splay_tree_key k)
> +{
> + bool is_tgt_unmapped = false;
> + splay_tree_remove (&devicep->mem_map, k);
> +
Hi Jakub!
Any comments on my questions, please?
On Thu, 02 May 2019 16:03:09 +0200, I wrote:
> I'm currently working on other pending OpenACC 'deviceptr' clause patches
> from our backlog, and I noticed the following, which I don't understand.
> You reviewed and approved this patch, could you ple
Hi Jakub!
I'm currently working on other pending OpenACC 'deviceptr' clause patches
from our backlog, and I noticed the following, which I don't understand.
You reviewed and approved this patch, could you please help?
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:01:20 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> --- a/libgomp/
On 06/20/2018 10:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:59:29AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> If it means anything, we have a significant async change that removes
>> the async_refcount field in that struct.
>
> Wasn't async_refcount removed 2 years ago?
You're right. I wa
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:59:29AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> > I'm not entirely happy about this, it grows the structure for not just
> > OpenACC, but also OpenMP which will never use it. Are there any fields
> > not used by OpenACC? E.g. is link_key used?
> > Or could the dynamic refcoun
On 06/20/2018 09:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:01:20AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> >From 53ee03231c5e6e4747b4ef01335079a2d4a98480 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Cesar Philippidis
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:33:04 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 7/7] runtime changes
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:01:20AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch implements the OpenACC 2.5 data clause semantics in libgomp.
>
> Is it OK for trunk?
> 2018-06-19 Chung-Lin Tang
> Thomas Schwinge
> Cesar Philippidis
>
> libgomp/
> * libgomp.h (
This patch updates the existing OpenACC libgomp runtime tests with the
new OpenACC 2.5 data clause semantics.
Is it OK for trunk?
Cesar
2018-06-19 Chung-Lin Tang
Thomas Schwinge
Cesar Philippidis
libgomp/
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-already-1.c: Update test
case
This patch implements the OpenACC 2.5 data clause semantics in libgomp.
Is it OK for trunk?
Cesar
2018-06-19 Chung-Lin Tang
Thomas Schwinge
Cesar Philippidis
libgomp/
* libgomp.h (struct splay_tree_key_s): Add dynamic_refcount member.
(gomp_acc_remove_pointer): Update declarati
11 matches
Mail list logo
