On 21/02/2013 19:35, Anthony Green wrote:
> This patch looks fine, thanks. I don't plan to merge back into GCC
> for at least a week or two, so I think you should commit it to the GCC
> tree independently.
Committed to GCC revision 196527. Thanks!
cheers,
DaveK
On 21/02/2013 19:35, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Gcc-patches: Assuming AG approves, can we commit this without waiting for
>> an
>> upstream libffi release and doing a full merge? Currently GCC HEAD won't
>> build libffi (and hence libjava) withou
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> Gcc-patches: Assuming AG approves, can we commit this without waiting for an
> upstream libffi release and doing a full merge? Currently GCC HEAD won't
> build libffi (and hence libjava) without it.
This patch looks fine, thanks. I don't pla
On 07/11/2012 00:14, Magnus Granberg wrote:
> 2012-11-07 Magnus Granberg Pavel Labushev
>* configure.ac: Add --enable-pax_emutramp for PaX enable kernels.
>* src/closures.c: Add emutramp_enabled_check. Don't mmap with PROT_EXEC
> on PaX enable Ke
