ok.
thanks,
David
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Here is the new patch that walks op looking for the reference to addr.
>
> Passes internal benchmarks and regression tests. Ok for google/4_9?
>
> Thanks,
> Teresa
>
> 2014-10-27 Teresa Johnson
>
> Google ref
Here is the new patch that walks op looking for the reference to addr.
Passes internal benchmarks and regression tests. Ok for google/4_9?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-10-27 Teresa Johnson
Google ref b/18110567.
* cgraphbuild.c (fixup_all_refs_1): New function.
(fixup_all_refs
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> When orgin_addr == addr, is there a guarantee that this assert:
>
> gcc_assert (TREE_OPERAND (op,0) == addr);
>
> is always true?
It should be, that is the assumption of the code that we are trying to
enforce with the assert.
Teresa
When orgin_addr == addr, is there a guarantee that this assert:
gcc_assert (TREE_OPERAND (op,0) == addr);
is always true?
David
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> This patch makes a fix to the reference fixups performed after LIPO
> node resolution, to better handle t
This patch makes a fix to the reference fixups performed after LIPO
node resolution, to better handle the case where we are updating the
base address of a reference.
Fixes google benchmark and passes regression tests. Ok for google/4_9?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-10-24 Teresa Johnson
Google
