Indu Bhagat writes:
> On 4/15/25 11:52 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Indu Bhagat writes:
>>> Using post-index st2g is a faster way of memory tagging/untagging.
>>> Because a post-index 'st2g tag, [addr], #32' is equivalent to:
>>> stg tag, addr, #0
>>> stg tag, addr, #16
>>> add add
On 4/15/25 11:52 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Indu Bhagat writes:
Using post-index st2g is a faster way of memory tagging/untagging.
Because a post-index 'st2g tag, [addr], #32' is equivalent to:
stg tag, addr, #0
stg tag, addr, #16
add addr, addr, #32
TBD:
- Currently generated
Indu Bhagat writes:
> Using post-index st2g is a faster way of memory tagging/untagging.
> Because a post-index 'st2g tag, [addr], #32' is equivalent to:
>stg tag, addr, #0
>stg tag, addr, #16
>add addr, addr, #32
>
> TBD:
> - Currently generated by in the aarch64 backend. Not sure
Using post-index st2g is a faster way of memory tagging/untagging.
Because a post-index 'st2g tag, [addr], #32' is equivalent to:
stg tag, addr, #0
stg tag, addr, #16
add addr, addr, #32
TBD:
- Currently generated by in the aarch64 backend. Not sure if this is
the right way to do i
