On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 11:52 AM, Mikael Morin wrote
>>
>> OK.
>
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
>
>> I guess the division will be dropped too (the middle-end does the
>> reverse multiplication implicitly in the pointer arithmetic).
>> I wonder which one
On 07/20/2012 11:52 AM, Mikael Morin wrote
OK.
Thanks for the review.
I guess the division will be dropped too (the middle-end does the
reverse multiplication implicitly in the pointer arithmetic).
I wonder which one is faster (the casts in the second version are
certainly not nice for the mi
On 15/07/2012 08:23, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> that's a follow up cleanup to the patch, which has just been merged.
> Most parts should be really obvious and nice, however, the offset part
> isn't. As the offset is not part of the descriptor defined at DTS
> 29113:2012's "8.2 C descript
Dear all,
that's a follow up cleanup to the patch, which has just been merged.
Most parts should be really obvious and nice, however, the offset part
isn't. As the offset is not part of the descriptor defined at DTS
29113:2012's "8.2 C descriptors" (p. 17), we will have to drop it at
some poi
