Re: [Fortran-dev, patch, committed] Minor fixes

2012-03-12 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 03/12/2012 01:50 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: Additionally, I modified some tree-dump patterns for the extent and for the base_addr change. Three more changes: The libgfortran change should have been just a cleanup, but it seems to also fix a failure. Plus two dump changes. The number of failu

Re: [Fortran-dev, patch, committed] Minor fixes

2012-03-12 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Tobias, > At some point, the extent calculation should be updated. Dumps like the > following hurt, even if -O1 handles* them: > (((D.1871->dim[0].lower_bound + D.1871->dim[0].extent) + -1) - > D.1871->dim[0].lower_bound) + 1. > [* maybe -fstrict-overflow and/or -fno-protect-parens is requir

[Fortran-dev, patch, committed] Minor fixes

2012-03-12 Thread Tobias Burnus
I have committed a fix for one link issue (spurious GFC_DESCRIPTOR_STRIDE_BYTES which escaped the renaming to GFC_DESCRIPTOR_SM) - and changed "data" to "base_addr" for consistency. Rev. 185216. Additionally, I modified some tree-dump patterns for the extent and for the base_addr change. Re