On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This patch was committed to trunk (r265940), but HJ's review comments
> were never addressed (and look correct to me):
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3QJw9yc7Scra74WXzR3yBDR6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2Fml%2Fgcc-patches%2F2016-07%2Fmsg00146.html
On 29/01/19 14:12 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:07:31PM +, Romain GEISSLER wrote:
> Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch t
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:07:31PM +, Romain GEISSLER wrote:
> > Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch to address this?
> >
> > Marek
>
> H
> Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch to address this?
>
> Marek
Hi,
I submitted the original patch because it was not written by me but by Davide,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
The patch is OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks. Can you please apply it as I don't have any commit rights ?
The patch can be found in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01240.html
Here is a valid gcc/ChangeLog correctly formated where I am ref
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:00 PM Romain Geissler
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=lld.
> > >
> >
> > LGTM. But I can't approve it.
> >
> > --
>
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=lld.
> >
>
> LGTM. But I can't approve it.
>
> --
> H.J.
Hi,
Is there any gcc reviewer that could comment whether or not this sm
