On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:09:32AM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 10:55 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> >diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >index 76fdc31..5549f17 100644
> >--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >@@ -6665,17 +6665,19 @@ Says
On 10/29/2015 10:55 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 76fdc31..5549f17 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -6665,17 +6665,19 @@ Says to make debugging dumps during compilation at
times specified by
@var{letters}.
Hi Sandra,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:22:01AM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> s/will be registered/are registered/
Fixed, alongside other occurrences.
> >+registered by plugins, which are specific to compilation targets, or
> >+which are otherwise registered after all t
On 10/29/2015 09:52 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 76fdc31..148f063 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -6665,17 +6665,19 @@ Says to make debugging dumps during compilation at
times specified by
@var{letters}.
Hi,
The text for -fdump-rtl- is a little misleading about how much you can
derive about pass ordering from the numbers on the dumps. This patch tries
to update the text to clarify that (most of the time) you can quite happily
derive execution order from these pass numbers.
While I'm there I've f
